More complications with single-incision repair

Patients treated with double-incision repair using transosseous drill holes for acute distal biceps rupture may see fewer complications than those treated with single-incision repair using suture anchors, according to the results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial presented by Ruby Grewal, MD, MSc, FRCSC, at the 2010 ASSH annual meeting.

The researchers randomized 90 male patients to receive either single-incision repair (n = 48) or double-incision repair (n = 42). The two groups had no significant differences in patient age, dominant hand, or number of workers compensation cases. Overall mean American Shoulder and Elbow Society pain scores were similar in both groups at all follow-up points (3, 6, 12, and 24 months).

At 24 months, no significant differences were found between the treatment groups in final extension, pronation, or supination. The research team noted a marginal advantage in mean isometric flexion strength regained among participants in the double-incision group (double: 104 percent; single: 94 percent; p = 0.01).

This content is only available to members of the AAOS.

Please log in using the link at the top right corner of this page to access your exclusive AAOS member content.

Not a member? Become a member!